When a
scientific discovery is made, it hits the news instantly, a bunch of equations
are derived and verified, a series of tests are conducted to prove their
authenticity, and a number of awards are bestowed upon the person who
discovered it. A work of art, however, is not met with the same unanimous
appreciation. Everybody has, at some point, said “This book is terrible!”, “What
a boring movie!” or “You call this music?!”.
Beauty lies
in the eyes of the beholder, and that’s why the success of a piece of art is
decided solely by the opinion of its audience. Then again, what is “success” to
an artist? It could be a number of things varying from money and fame to appreciation
and feedback. A director who wants his movie to connect with people emotionally
may consider it a success even if he makes no money but gets a bit of the
audience to shed a tear or two. And a singer may be perfectly happy with all
his viewers sniggering about his lack of talent as long as he gets thousands of
hits on Youtube.
Take books,
for instance. Anybody who has read The
Lord of the Rings knows that JRR Tolkien loved creating images of majestic
kingdoms and spinning tales of history and lore. He planted in every reader’s
head, a picture beautifully adorned with castles and forests and a detailed back
story to all of it. He adds an authentic touch with his effective use of
archaic language, which strengthens the “once-upon-a-time” factor in the fairy
tale trilogy. It is true that a large number of people find it very hard to get
through his books, what with heavy reading required and the lack of a gripping
story. But avid readers will always love him for the world he created, for his
bountiful imagination and his evident passion for writing, as will creative
writers. And that in itself is quite a success to his credit.
If the
target audience is one that likes fast paced, exciting stories with twists and
turns in every page, then George R. R. Martin is a winner. His latest work, A Song of Ice and Fire, is a series of
books about the battle between many dynasties for a kingdom. Martin has made the
books very unpredictable, exhibiting the courage to kill off many important
characters, something that most authors would never venture, out of fear of
losing a huge chunk of the story. But Martin knows no fear, and the
story gets wilder and wilder with surprises at the turn of every page. Another
thing that keeps readers totally hooked to this series is the lack of a well-defined
“good guy” and “bad guy”. It is impossible to pick a hero or a villain, because
every time you try, a brave knight commits treason, or a baseborn thief saves a
life. And since there is no good guy or bad guy, there is no saying who the
real winner is, in the game of thrones. And this uncertainty keeps the reader
interested through every page of the voluminous series.
Chetan
Bhagat’s success as an author has always been challenged by many who claim that
he does not have the gift for writing. But there is no denying that he did shoot
to fame through his books. His books are entertainers, the easy-to-read types, which
are more dialogue and less narration, and his topics are very relevant to
everyday life. He caters to that section that prefers light reading and less to
think about, which, fortunately for him, happens to constitute a large part of
India’s youth these days. His idea of success, one could assume, is fame. And he is
certainly one guy who became a success by knowing his audience.
Music also
is always met with a volley of contrasting opinions, and there are umpteen
bases on which a piece of music can be judged. There are so many ways in which
music can reach a person. Many people judge songs based on the lyrics – some look
for use of language, some look for the poetic touch, and some look for lyrics
that they can relate to personally. Some people are more interested in the
instrumental part of the song. The right usage of instruments can be very
powerful in setting the mood of a song. A song, purely with proper use of
instruments, can touch a person deeply and bring a smile to the face or tears to
the eye. And when a song can achieve that effect, it is met with high
appreciation. Some music lovers look for the overwhelming power of technology
to edit a song to make it just perfect, while there are equally contrasting opinions
in people who believe that technology shadows talent, and a song performed with
nothing but simple instruments and the vocal abilities of the singer is of more
musical value. This is again a situation where the artist needs to pick the
audience he wants to cater to. For most Indian music, a huge difference is made
to songs purely by the singers. A singer with a great voice can turn a boring
song into one pleasant to the ears. A singer, with a trained and practised
control over his/her voice attempting hard notes, can create awe in the musically literate. A singer who expresses the lyrics with the intended emotion in his/her
voice can touch many people, even when one does not understand the lyrics.
And of
course, there will always be those worldwide hits like Kolaveri and Gangnam
style. These numbers, though seemingly devoid of anything extraordinary, got
into every one of our minds and refused to leave until they got our heads nodding
to the white-u skin-u girl-u, and our feet tapping to Psy’s random
exclamations!!
I suppose
the same holds good for movies, paintings, fashion designers and the like. We
are all constantly judging and deciding the success of different people every
single day. What with being made to accept all scientific facts as infallible, art
is the outlet for freedom of expression, both for the artist, and for the
heavily opinionated audience. Because after all, only Phoebe Buffay is at
liberty to challenge the concept of gravity – “Lately, I get the feeling that I’m not so much being pulled down as I
am being pushed”.
So whom do you write for?
ReplyDeleteAs of now, mainly for myself :) Haven't discovered if I have an audience yet!
DeleteWell, you do have audience now :)
ReplyDeleteBeing a Technical Writer, I concur with your premise, because you hit a nerve there, with "Audience Analysis" being an important aspect of all expressions (artistic and others). However, at a more primal level, could it be also be something more? I mean, what about passion? It is the sheer passion that reaches out to one and many.
The outward expression of the verve, that is passion then finds patrons and connoisseurs in a more natural (and the most befitting manner). I feel, passion is an undercurrent in all expressionists and observers. Let's for the sake of this discussion call them do-ers and woo-ers. More fervent in the do-ers and latent in the woo-ers. Nevertheless it is there... pulsating within each sentient being. After all, we are all chips of the same block, limited quantas, packets, of an omnipotent creator. Try as we may, we are bound to be creative. In our own zillion different ways.
R.R. Tolkien was so passionate that he weaved an epic so intricate and so large, it is as though he created a universe, with species, geographies, languages and a purpose to bind them all. Peter Jackson, patiently waited for over a decade to recreate LOTR visually and boy! did he manage to do it well! Studying the books, researching characters, story-arcs, behavior and so many other details.
Usha Uthup stood firm by her style of singing, I am not judging it to be good or bad, she had her cult following, however she had to wait 42 years to get her first award at a filmfare or so. But the passion, the vigor in her remains undeterred.
Stan Lee was responsible for creating a Marvel Universe.
Kailash Kher was rebuked at his style of singing, but now his style is inimitable and widely applauded.
I think that true passion finds its own audience.
I stand corrected. Passion finds its own audience. There is nothing true or false about passion. It just is.
ReplyDeleteBtw, I stumbled on your blog post, incidentally. I was searching for a blog that has a large collection of poems.
ReplyDeleteI am intrigued by your comment on Chetan Bhagat. While I have read none of his books and dont claim to be an expert on his writing style (as everyone knows from Dilbert, management has prerogative to have an opinion any subject without having any knowledge on it whatsoever!) I think that he has a very good audience for his books and should stick to what will make him successful - writing those books! Instead of getting on talk shows, telling women what to do, debating political issues he knows nothing about etc.
ReplyDeleteVery good writing btw so you have one more audien
Thank you :)
Delete